Albright v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, ((Interpreting Lively v. Secretary of Health and Human Services)—Effect of Prior Disability Findings on Adjudication of a Subsequent Disability Claim—Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 00-1(4)
Blakes v. Barnhart (cases involving sections 12.05 and 112.05 of the Listing of Impairments that are remanded by a court for further proceedings under titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 03-1(7)
Bloodsworth v. Heckler (judicial review of Appeals Council dismissal of a request for review of an Administrative Law Judge decision — titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 99-4(11)
Boyland v. Califano (the "contribution to support" requirement of section 216(h)(3)(C)(ii) of the Social Security Act), AR 86-15(6)
Capitano v. Secretary of HHS (entitlement of a deemed widow when a legal widow is entitled on the same earnings record — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 86-2R(2)
Chavez v. Bowen, (effect of a prior final decision that a claimant is not disabled, and of findings contained therein, on adjudication of a subsequent disability claim arising under the same title of the Social Security Act — Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 97-4(9)
Childress v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (the "contribution to support" requirement of section 216(h)(3)(C)(ii) of the Social Security Act), AR 86-15(6)
Culbertson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (waiver of administrative finality in proceedings involving unrepresented claimants who lack the mental competence to request administrative review — titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 90-4(4)
Damon v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare (child benefits: support of child adopted after worker's entitlement to benefits — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 86-16(2)
Daniels on Behalf of Daniels v. Sullivan (application of a State's intestacy law requirement that paternity be established during the lifetime of the father — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 97-3(11)
Dennard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (effect of a prior finding of the demands of past work on adjudication of a subsequent disability claim arising under the same title of the Social Security Act — titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act) AR 98-3(6)
DeSonier v. Sullivan (method of application of State Intestate Succession Law in determining entitlement to child's benefits — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 96-1(6)
Difford v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (scope of review on appeal in a medical cessation of disability case — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 92-2(6)
Dion v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (applicability of the windfall offset provision), AR 88-4(1)
Doran v. Schweiker (contributions to support re: posthumous illegitimate child — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 86-23(9)
Drummond v. Commissioner of Social Security (effect of prior findings on adjudication of a subsequent disability claim arisign under the same title of the Social Security Act), AR 98-4(6)
Fagner v. Heckler (applicability of section 1127 of the Social Security Act), AR 86-25(9)
Florez on Behalf of Wallace v. Callahan (supplemental security income — deeming of income from a stepparent to a child when the natural parent is not living in the same household — title XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 99-1(2)
Fowlkes v. Adamec (determining whether an individual is a fugitive felon under the Social Security Act), AR 06-1(2)
Gillett-Netting v. Barnhart (applicability of State law and the Social Security Act in determining whether a child conceived by artificial means after an insured person's death is eligible for child's insurance benefits — Title II of the Social Security Act), AR 05-1(9)
Gonzalez v. Sullivan (effect of initial determination notice language on the application of administrative finality — titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 92-7(9)
Grigg v. Finch (correction of an individual's earnings record to reflect self-employment income for years in which the individual did not timely file an income tax return), AR 86-20(6)
Hodge v. Shalala (worker's compensation — proration of a lump-sum award for permanent disability over the remainder of an individual's working life — Oregon — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 95-2(9)
Howard on behalf of Wolff v. Barnhart (applicability of the statutory requirement for pediatrician review in childhood disability cases to the Hearings and Appeals levels of the administrative review process — Title XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 04-1(9)
Hutcheson v. Califano (determination of stepchild and resulting entitlement to auxiliary benefits — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 86-12(9)
Jones v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare (child's benefits — contributions for support — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 86-14(4)
Leschniok v. Heckler (necessity of a determination under sections 225(b) and/or 1631(a)(6) of the Social Security Act for a disability benefits recipient engaged in an approved vocational rehabilitation program prior to cessation of his/her benefits based on medical recovery), AR 86-5(9)
Levings v. Califano (definition of an inmate of a public institution — title XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 88-6(8)
Lidy v. Sullivan (right to subpoena an examining physician for cross-examination purposes — titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 91-1(5)
Martinez v. Heckler (disability program — individuals who are illiterate and unable to communicate in English — titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 86-3(5)
Mazza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (order of effectuation in concurrent application cases) — titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 92-1(3)
McNeal v. Schweiker (child's benefits — contributions for support — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 86-13(3)
Parker v. Schweiker (the "contribution to support" requirement of section 216(h)(3)(C)(ii) of the Social Security Act), AR 86-15(6)
Parsons v. Health and Human Services (contributions to support re: posthumous illegitimate child — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 86-22(4)
Paskel v. Heckler (necessity of a determination under sections 225(b) and/or 1631(a)(6) of the Social Security Act for a disability benefits recipient engaged in an approved vocational rehabilitation program prior to cessation of his/her benefits based on medical recovery), AR 86-4(3)
Quinlivan v. Sullivan (meaning of the term "against equity and good conscience" in the rules for waiver of recovery of an overpayment — titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act; title IV of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977), AR 92-5(9)
Rosenberg v. Richardson (entitlement of a deemed widow when a legal widow is entitled on the same earnings record — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 86-2R(2)
Ruppert v. Bowen (evaluation of a rental subsidy as in-kind income for supplemental security income benefit calculation purposes), AR 90-2(2)
State of Minnesota v. Apfel (coverage for Employees Under a Federal-State Section 218 Agreement or Modification and Application of the Student Services Exclusion From Coverage to Services Performed by medical residents — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 98-5(8)
Sykes v. Apfel (using the grid rules as a framework for decisionmaking when an individual's occupational base is eroded by a nonexertional limitation — titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 01-1(3)
Wolfe v. Sullivan (contributions to support — posthumous illegitimate child — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 94-1(10)
Woodson v. Schweiker (interpretation of the deemed marriage provision — title II of the Social Security Act), AR 86-18R(5), AR 86-19R(11)
Young v. Bowen (waiver of administrative finality in proceedings involving unrepresented claimants who lack the mental competence to request administrative review — titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act), AR 90-4(4)
